Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18601 (JHR)

BINIT DHAN v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5871/2025 · 2025-07-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:19387] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5871 of 2025 ------ Binit Dhan aged about 24 years S/o William Dhan, Resident of Village- Bargain, P.O. Sadar, P.S. Lem, District- Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kr. Prasad, Advocate Mr. Kishore Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-16-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No.106 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 304(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner snatched the mobile phone of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the alleged stolen mobile phone has already been recovered from the possession of the co-accused. It is then submitted that at present, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-6 of the instant bail application and he has already been acquitted in one case, which was instituted against him. It is then submitted that charge- sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined so far, during the trial of the case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.04.2025 as is evident from para-4 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-XIII, Ranchi in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No.106 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/