RAMAKANTA DAIMARY AND 19 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
WP(C)/6471/2022 · 2025-03-19
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18600 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18600 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/8 GAHC010197092022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6471/2022 RAMAKANTA DAIMARY AND 19 ORS S/O- LT. SAKULA DAIMARI, VILL- PANERI HAT, P.O. PANERI HAT, DIST.- UDALGURI, BTAD, ASSAM, PIN- 784523 2: DIPU BORO S/O- SRI NAREN BORO VILL- RANGIA WARD NO-4 P.O. RANGIA DIST.- KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN- 781354 3: ANIL SARKAR S/O- LT. NANI SARKAR VILL- SOCHIPUR P.O. DARANGA MELA DIST.- BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN- 781368 4: JYOTISH CHANDRA ROY S/O- LT. JIL MOHAN ROY VILL- AGRANG P.O. ANANDA BAZAR DIST.- BAKSA (BTAD) ASSAM PIN- 783390 5: BARNALI MALLICK D/O- ANIL BARAN MALLICK VILL- PANERI HAT P.O. PANERI HAT
Page No.# 2/8 DIST.- UDALGURI BTAD ASSAM PIN- 784523 6: RAJU SAHA S/O- RANJIT SAHA VILL- DWARKUCHI P.O. DWARKUCHI DIST.- BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN- 781368 7: KABITA DAS W/O- RANJIT SARKAR VILL- GHOGAPAR P.O. GHOGAPAR DIST.- NALBARI ASSAM PIN- 781368 8: DEEPALI SARKAR D/O- GURUDAS SARKAR VILL- NARAYANGAON P.O. TINPUKHURI DIST.- NALABRI ASSAM PIN- 781367 9: PRASENJIT MALLIK S/O- LT. PRATAP CHANDRA MALLIK VILL- BAMUNDI P.O. ERA BAMUNDI DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781311 10: RATAN SAHA S/O- LT. DHARMENDRA CHANDRA SAHA VILL- DWARKUCHI P.O. DWARKUCHI DIST.- BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN- 781368 11: ANJAN SARKAR
Page No.# 3/8 S/O- SRI GURUDAS SARKAR VILL- NARAYANGAON P.O. TINPUKHURI DIST.- NALBARI ASSAM PIN- 781367 12: SURAJIT PAUL S/O- SRIDAM PAUL VILL- CHOKAMARI P.O. GHOGAPAR DIST.- NALBARI ASSAM PIN- 781368 13: BISHNU PUN S/O- LT. CHAM BAHADUR PUN VILL- NARAYANPUR P.O. NARAYANPUR DIST.- BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN- 781368 14: PROBAL SHIL S/O- LT. GOPAL SHIL VILL- DAKSHIN PUNIA P.O. GHOGAPAR DIST.- BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN- 781368 15: MANIRAJ CHANDRA NATH S/O- LT. SUBAL CHANDRA NATH VILL- BARKHAPA P.O. BARKHOPA DIST.- BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN- 781368 16: BALIRAJ CHANDRA NATH S/O- SRI SUBAL CHANDRA NATH VILL- BARKHAPA P.O. BARKHOPA DIST.- BAKSA BTAD ASSAM
Page No.# 4/8 PIN- 781368 17: ANUPAMA GHOSH D/O- LT. HARADHAN GHOSH VILL- RUPSHI PART-I P.O. RUPSHI PART-I P.O. RUPSHI BAZAR DIST.- KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM PIN- 783331 18: MIRA SARKAR D/O- GURUDAS SARKAR VILL- NARAYANGAON P.O. TINIPUKHURI DIST.- NALBARI ASSAM PIN- 781367 19: RITUMONI BEGUM W/O- MD. ALI HUSSAIN VILL- DWARKUCHI P.O. DWARKUCHI DIST.- BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN- 781368 20: MD. WAHEDUR RAHMAN S/O- MD. ABDUL ALI VILL- DWARKUCHI P.O. DWARKUCHI DIST.- BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN- 78136 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY.
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-6
Page No.# 5/8 3:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19 4:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECY. P.O. KOKRAJHAR DIST.- KOKRAJHAR (BTAD) ASSAM PIN- 783370 5:THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION BTAD KOKRAJHAR P.O. KOKRAJHAR DIST.- KOKRAJHAR (BTAD) ASSAM PIN- 783370 6:THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN- 783370 7:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BAKSA MUSHALPUR P.O. MUSHALPUR DIST.- BAKSA (BTAD) ASSAM PIN- 781372 8:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER TAMULPUR P.O. TAMULPUR DIST.- BAKSA (BTAD) ASSAM PIN- 781372 9:THE TREASURY OFFICER NALBARI TREASURY NALBARI DIST.- NALBARI (ASSAM) PIN- 78133
Page No.# 6/8 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K R PATGIRI, MS CHITRALEKHA DAS,MS K BARMAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, SC, FINANCE,SC, BTC
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER Date : 20.03
.2025 Heard Mr. K.R. Patgiri, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. A Borthakur, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel, BTC for respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6 as well as Mr. A Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department, Assam for respondent Nos. 2 and 9.
2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for a direction to the respondent authorities to regularize the services of the petitioners as Assistant Teacher as per the policy decision of the State respondents pursuant to the
order of this Court dated 06.02.2015 passed in a batch of writ appeal leading appeal being Writ Appeal No. 182/2013 and order dated 07.11.2015 in WP (C) No. 6761/2015.
3. During the course of hearing, Mr. K.R. Patgiiri learned counsel for the petitioners while referring to Annexure X series annexed to the counter affidavit of the respondent authorities, fairly submits that the process of document verification is being held for consideration of regularization of the services of the petitioners. Initially, although he had instruction that out of 20 petitioners, the names of the 8 petitioners have been left out, now, the said 8 petitioners have
Page No.# 7/8 also been included.
4. Ms. A. Borthakur, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel BTC submits that the verification of documents of the petitioners is under process for which a considerable time may be taken. She also submits that the names of all the petitioners have been included for verification of the documents, which is under process.
5. Having considered the above, the respondent authorities are in the process of document verification for consideration for regularization of the services of the petitioners, I am of the considered view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping this writ petition pending as the grievance of the petitioners for a direction to the respondent authorities to regularize the services of the petitioners is being under consideration.
6. That apart, the learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that he has no objection for verification of the documents of the petitioners for regularization of the services of the petitioners.
7. Considered the above, I am of the view that keeping the matter pending would serve no purpose. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. Needless to observe that, the petitioners would be at liberty to approach this Court in the event the result/ decision of the respondent authorities are not palatable to the petitioners.
Page No.# 8/8
8. It is expected that the respondent authorities would complete the entire process within a reasonable period of time.
9. Writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant