Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185988 (ALL)

SANJAY VERMA v. STTAE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/11633/2025 · 2025-12-05

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11633 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 441 of 2025, under sections 64, 352, 351(2)(3) BNS, P.S. Gosainganj, District Sultanpur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that husband of informant was staying at Delhi and thereafter on request of applicants they were permitted to keep certain construction material in house of victim and around three years ago wrong was committed on her and thereafter physical relations were formed on various occasions. It was also stated that abortion was also got done. The tentative age of the victim is around 38 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that physical relation lasted for a substantial long period of time, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 13.9.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Sanjay Verma be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vaibhav Sharma, Aakash Rai, Anand Kumar Sharma, Pramod Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanjay Verma .....Applicant(s) Sttae Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 5, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11633 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench