RAM PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DAIRY DEVELOPMENT AND 2 OTHERS
/13945/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13945 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite party No.1 while notice on behalf of the opposite parties 2 and 3 has been accepted by Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:-
"1. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent No-2 i.e. Managing Director. Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited Lucknow to ensure payment of difference of leave encashment in view of own order dated 13.12.2022 as well as admissible interest on delayed payment of balance gratuity of Rs-78,849/ and arrear of promotional pay scale of Rs-303900/-within stipulated period, in the interest of justice.
2. Issue a writ or order in the nature of Mandamus coramanding the opposite party No-2 to examine the claim of petitioner for payment of difference of leave encashment in view of order dated 13.12.2022 as well as admissible interest on delayed payment of balance gratuity as well as arrears of promotional pay scale and ensure its payment within stipulated period, in the interest of justice."
3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Managing Director, Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case the petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefits, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 2, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sandeep Sharma (Manish Mathur,J.) Ram Prakash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dairy Development And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench