RACHIT GUPTA @ KARTIK GUPTA @ KARTIKEY GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
NA528/1975/2025 · 2025-12-03
Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185976 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185976 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1975 of 2025 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. 2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and personal bond in both cases in which he was roped and the applicant has been granted bail in both cases by the court concerned. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in two cases. He next submitted that in both the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court concerned. He says that the applicant is a very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant at District Lucknow which are as follows:- (i) Case Crime No.270 of 2024, under Sections 305A, 317(2), 331(4) of B.N.S., P.S.- Dubagga, District- Lucknow. (ii) Case Crime No.115 of 2024, under Sections 411, 414 I.P.C., Police Station- Bazarkhala, District- Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P.
5. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhaker Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rachit Gupta @ Kartik Gupta @ Kartikey Gupta .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs.20,000/- in both cases and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases.
December 3, 2025 Anand/- NA528 No. 1975 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench