APHC010257982020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between: 1. P CHENNAMMA, W/o Anki Reddy, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Housewife, Resident of D.No.20-4-37A3, Kothapalli, Ward No.5, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2. M.Sudhakar, S/o Ramana, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Coolie, Resident of D.No.2-82F, Yarramitta, Ward No.2, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3. Smt. P.Lakshmi, W/o Anki Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Housewife, Resident of D.No.3-134/5, S.N.Puram, Ward No.3, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 4. A.Sreenivasulu Reddy, S/o Subba Reddy, Aged ab Coolie, Resident of D.No.3 District. 5. Y.Gurrappa, S/o Ramakrishna, Aged about 43 years, Occ. Coolie, Resident of D.No.20-4-35C, Kothapalli, Ward No.5, Tirupati, Chittoor District, 1. THE STATE OF AP, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Chittoor District. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16986 OF 2020 1. P CHENNAMMA, W/o Anki Reddy, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Housewife, 37A3, Kothapalli, Ward No.5, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2. M.Sudhakar, S/o Ramana, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Coolie, Resident of 82F, Yarramitta, Ward No.2, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3. Smt. P.Lakshmi, W/o Anki Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Housewife, 134/5, S.N.Puram, Ward No.3, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 4. A.Sreenivasulu Reddy, S/o Subba Reddy, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Coolie, Resident of D.No.3-134/3, S.N.Puram, Ward No.3, Tirupati, Chittoor 5. Y.Gurrappa, S/o Ramakrishna, Aged about 43 years, Occ. Coolie, 35C, Kothapalli, Ward No.5, Tirupati, Chittoor District, ...Pe AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Chittoor IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. P CHENNAMMA, W/o Anki Reddy, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Housewife, 37A3, Kothapalli, Ward No.5, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2. M.Sudhakar, S/o Ramana, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Coolie, Resident of 3. Smt. P.Lakshmi, W/o Anki Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Housewife, 134/5, S.N.Puram, Ward No.3, Tirupati, Chittoor District. out 45 years, Occ. 134/3, S.N.Puram, Ward No.3, Tirupati, Chittoor 5. Y.Gurrappa, S/o Ramakrishna, Aged about 43 years, Occ. Coolie, 35C, Kothapalli, Ward No.5, Tirupati, Chittoor District, ...Petitioners 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Chittoor 4. 2. M.Sudhakar, S/o Ramana, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Coolie, Resident of 3. Smt. P.Lakshmi, W/o Anki Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Housewife, 134/5, S.N.Puram, Ward No.3, Tirupati, Chittoor District. out 45 years, Occ. 134/3, S.N.Puram, Ward No.3, Tirupati, Chittoor 5. Y.Gurrappa, S/o Ramakrishna, Aged about 43 years, Occ. Coolie, 35C, Kothapalli, Ward No.5, Tirupati, Chittoor District, ...Petitioners 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Chittoor 4. The Station House Officer, Alipiri Police Station, Alipiri, Chittoor District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in interfering in civil matters and over the rights of the petitioners in respect of property admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.00 cents each i.e., total admeasuring an extent of Ac.10.00 cents in Sy.No.170/2, situated in Chennaiahkunta village, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Chittoor District as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, highhanded and violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of orders passed in W.P.No.11996 of 2020 and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 herein not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners’ properties admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.00 cents each i.e., total admeasuring an extent of Ac.10.00 cents in Sy.No.170/2, situated in Chennaiahkunta village, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of this writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16986 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in interfering in civil matters and over the rights of the petitioners in respect of property admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.00 cents each i.e., total admeasuring an extent of Ac.10.00 cents in Sy.No.170/2, situated in Chennaiahkunta village, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Chittoor District as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, highhanded and violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of orders passed in W.P.No.11996 of 2020 and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners property and pass…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the same, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.09.2025. KKV 116 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16986 OF 2020 03.09.2025 KKV