HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10349 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Raghvendra Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for respondent No.s 1 to 5. Sri Abhinandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 6, same is taken on record. 2. In light of the order proposed to be passed notice to the private respondent is dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is recorded tenure holder of Gata No. 350, area 0.3520 hectares whose boundaries were not clear, hence proceedings under Section 24 of the of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 were initiated at the best of petitioner before Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil - Sadar, District - Sultanpur. Notices were issued by the Prescribed Authority to the effected parties and also obtained report from the concerned revenue official and after consideration of objections of the effected parties as well as reports submitted by the revenue officials passed order dated 10.07.2025, directing demarcation, pillar fixation and medhbandi of the said Gata. It is next submitted that in pursuance to order dated 10.07.2025, only demarcation and pillar fixation has been done, but physical possession of the said land has not been given to the petitioner nor medhbandi has been done. 4. Against the said order appeal was filed by respondent no. 6 before the Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, which is pending consideration. It has been submitted that despite passing of order dated 10.07.2025, the State- authorities are not providing physical possession as well as medhbandi of the aforesaid land. 5. Learned Standing counsel, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has equally efficacious and alternate remedy of executing the orders of revenue Court as per Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual where an order of revenue authority can be executed. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raghvendra Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramdev .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to approach the competent authority under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by the Prescribed Authority as well as of the other authorities. 7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach competent authority by moving appropriate application under para 460 of Revenue Court Manual to execute the orders of the revenue authorities. In case, such an application is moved within two weeks from today the same shall be disposed of expeditiously. November 6, 2025 A. Verma WRIC No. 10349 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench