Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18595 (RAJ)

PRADEEP KUMAR SON OF LATE SH. RAM CHARAN v. MS. RUKMANI RIYAD (IAS)

CCP/596/2023 · 2025-05-02

Anand Sharma, Shree Chandrashekhar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18541-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 596/2023 1. Pradeep Kumar Son Of Late Sh. Ram Charan, Resident Of Shyam Sadan, C-171, Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur (Mobile No. 9928848904). 2. Radha Krishan Son Of Late Sh. Devi Prasad, Resident Of House No. 4502, Telipada, Patvo Ka Rasta, Behind Masjid, Babu Bazar, Jaipur (Mobile No. 9414034356). ----Petitioners Versus 1. Ms. Rukmani Riyad (Ias), Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 2. Mr. Sant Lal Makkad, Deputy Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jaipur, Sanganer Zone, Sanganer, Jaipur. 3. Mr. Amit Sharma, Station House Officer, Police Station Sanganer, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Shankar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : : Mr. Samee Khan & Ms. Sunita Meena, AGC on behalf of Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Additional Advocate General Mr. Nalin G. Narain, Adv. Mr. Manish Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Sampat Lal Songara, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 02/05/2025 Mr. Prem Shankar Sharma, the learned counsel for petitioners tenders a copy of the order dated 19th February 2025. 2. Taken on record. [2025:RJ-JP:18541-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-596/2023] 3. There is an application vide I.A. No. 1/2025 filed by Dr. Ambedkar Smarak Vikas Smiti seeking impleadment in the present contempt proceeding. 4. Mr. Prem Shankar Sharma, the learned counsel for applicant submits that the correct facts were not apprised to this Court when D.B. Civil Writ (PIL) Petition No. 9882/2020 came to be finally disposed of vide order dated 24th May 2022. 5. However, having regard to the order dated 19th February 2025 passed by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Greater, Jaipur which discloses that the applicant was afforded an opportunity of hearing, we are not inclined to entertain I.A. No. 1/2025 which is accordingly dismissed. However, the applicant shall have liberty to challenge the order dated 12th March 2025. D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 596/2023: In view of the order dated 12th March 2025 passed by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Greater at Jaipur, the proceeding in the present contempt petition is closed. (ANAND SHARMA),J (SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR),J NEERU/38