Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.26900 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.No.26900 of 2009 and M.P.No.2 of 2009
1. Tmt.M.Elizabeth
2. P.Sekar
3. M.Rajendiran ... Petitioner(s)
Vs. 1. The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Director, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3. The District Collector, Collectorate, Villupuram. 4. The District Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District. 5. Padmini https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.26900 of 2009
6. P.Bhuvaneshwari
7. R.Padmanaban
8. S.Anbarasu
9. G.Vasugi
10. R.Vaigundam
11. K.Mummorthy
12. R.Kalaiselvan
13. A.Dhanapal
14. S.Marimuthu
15. D.Radhika
16. N.Nehru
17. M.Periyasamy
18. D.Sankar
19. M.Balakrishnan
20. J.Jayasankar
21. A.Uma Mageshwari
22. K.Marimuthu
23. A.Jayamoorthi
24. V.Manikumar
25. S.Thangarasu
26. R.Sekar
27. N.Parimala
28. G.Vivek
29. N.Apparsundaram https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.26900 of 2009
30. S.Chitrabanu
31. R.Nalini
32. P.Pushparaj
33. K.Palanivel
34. P.Moorthi
25. A.Jeyapriya
... Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to re-draw the panel for the post of BT Assistants for the year 2008 in terms of Secondary Grade Assistant Seniority in consonance with Rule 2(b) of the Madras Harijan Welfare Subordinate Service Rules and consequently promote the petitioner as B.T. Assistant on par with their juniors with all consequential service and monetary benefits. For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.K.H.Ravikumar, Government Advocate O R D E R This matter earlier came up for consideration before this court on
22.08.2025. As there was no representation for the petitioner, the same was directed to be listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. Page 3 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.26900 of 2009
2. Today, inspite of the matter being listed under the caption
“For Dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. In view of the same, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No costs. 25.08.2025 skr Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.26900 of 2009 To
1.
The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Director, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3. The District Collector, Collectorate, Villupuram. 4. The District Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District. Page 5 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.26900 of 2009 MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J. skr W.P.No.26900 of 2009 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.26900 of 2009 25.08.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis