THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BMTC v. HANUMANTHEGOWDA SINCE DECEASED REP BY HIS LR SMT PREMA
RP/415/2022 · 2025-02-05
Anant Ramanath Hegde
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18595 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18595 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5247 RP No. 415 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REVIEW PETITION NO. 415 OF 2022 IN W.P.NO.4058 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
1.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BMTC CENTRAL OFFICES K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560027 NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER BMTC CENTRAL OFFICE K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560027.
2.
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, BMTC WEST DIVISION, KENGERI BENGALURU - 560060, NOW REP. BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER, BMTC CENTRAL OFFICE, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560027. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE) AND: HANUMANTHEGOWDA SINCE DECEASED REP BY HIS LR SMT PREMA, W/O LATE HANUMANTHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.15, HANUMANTHAPURA AT AND POST, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT - 573128. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI M C BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by BELUR RANGADHAMA NANDINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5247 RP No. 415 of 2022
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS REVIEW PETITION, BY REVIEWING THE ORDER DATED 14/06/2021 IN WP NO.
4058/2016 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. This Order under Review is passed on 14.06.2021 in W.P.No.4058/2016. Learned Single Judge who has passed the
order is now not the sitting judge of this Court. Hence, the matter is placed before this Court.
3. Considering the materials on record, it is noticed that the review is sought based on the additional documents which were not produced by the petitioner-Corporation, in Writ Petition the review petitioner was respondent.
4. The Writ Petition filed in the year 2016 was
disposed of in the year 2021. The petition was pending
consideration before the Court since 2016 to 2021. The
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5247 RP No. 415 of 2022 grounds urged seeking production of additional documents are not satisfactory.
5. Under these circumstances, this Court does not find any error in the order passed by the learned Single Judge in the Writ Petition No.4058/2016, as per the materials placed in the Writ Petition.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
7. I.A.No.2/2022 seeking production of additional documents is dismissed. In view of the disposal of the review petition, I.A.No.3/2022 seeking stay does not survive for
consideration. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25