GAURAV SINGH v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. /PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/6/2024 · 2025-11-26
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185946 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185946 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 6 of 2024
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR/Case Crime No.0161 of 2024 under sections 105 and 318(5) BNS, P.S. Aalapur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. It is argued that the applicant was granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 21.08.2024.
4. It is informed that the charge-sheet has been filed and there is nothing on record to demonstrate that the applicant did not cooperate with the investigation, as such, the interim bail is extended till the conclusion of the trial.
5. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed.
6. Thus, in the event of the applicant Gaurav Singh surrendered before the trial court, he shall be released on anticipatory bail till the conclusion of the trial in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each separately to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nadeem Murtaza, Shashank Tilhari, Wali Nawaz Khan, Yash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gaurav Singh .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 26, 2025 VNP/- NABAIL No. 6 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench