- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2158 WP No. 14093 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 14093 OF 2020 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. ARVIND KUMAR PAREKH S/O LATE MANGILAL AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.20, 3RD CROSS, GANDHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 009. 2. LALITH KUMAR PAREKH S/O LATE MANGILAL AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.20, 3RD CROSS, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAVI H K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 002. 2. M/S KARLE INFRA TECH MARIYANNAPALYA ROAD, VEERANNA PALYA , NAGAVARA, BENGALURU-560 045. REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. SUDARSHAN KARLE S/O SRI. L.T. KARLE, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/A NO. 261, 4TH MAIN, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2158 WP No. 14093 of 2020 BENGALURU-560 086. (AMENDED CARIED OUT AS PER ORDER DT. 27.11.2023) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASHANTH S H.,ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD.20.2.2020 MADE BY THE PETITIONER NO.1 TO IT VIDE ANNEXURE-R AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this Writ Petition was for a direction to consider the representation dated 20.02.2020 vide Annexure-Q and for issuance of a mandamus to direct the respondents not to desilt the dysfunction irrigational canal passing through land in Sy.Nos.64, 73, 90, 102, 103, 105, 116, 117, 142, 143, 151, 152 and 155 of Nagavara village. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner himself submits that the representation dated 20.02.2020 had, in - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2158 WP No. 14093 of 2020 fact, been considered by the Zonal Commissioner, and an order has been passed on 13.12.2024. 3. In the light of this submission, it is obvious that the prayer made in the Writ Petition would not survive for consideration and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become unnecessary. 4. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to take such appropriate action as may be permissible in law, in respect of the aforementioned order dated 13.12.2024. 5. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51