HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12887 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anand Dwivedi, counsel for respondent no. 1, Mr. Rupesh Kumar Kasaudhan, advocate, holding brief of Mr. Pratul Kumar Srivastava, counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to move the appropriate petition/case before the Central Administrative Tribunal. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. In view of the above, the present petition is hereby dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. November 4, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Newton Kishore Saxena, Shipra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Pratul Kumar Srivastava (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ruchi Kumari .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Communic. Deptt. Telecommunications New Delhi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench