1 / 3 2025:CGHC:19576 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2970 of 2025 1 - Aditya Thakur S/o Dinesh Kumar Singh Aged About 44 Years Hatri Chowk, Agnivanshi Bada, Lohar Chowk Purani Basti District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Additional Director General Of Police Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Inspector General Of Police, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Assistant Inspector General Of Police, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Srijan Singh, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Dy. Govt. Advocate SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.05.01 10:25:37 +0530 2 / 3 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 30/04/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner, who is presently working on the post of Sub-Inspector, is seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities for necessary correction in the gradation list dated 06/04/2023. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the gradation list has been prepared by the respondent authorities without adhering to the provision prescribed in the circular dated 09/12/2015 and ignoring the merit of the petitioner. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 21/02/2025 (Annexure P/6) before the DGP/ Respondent No.2, however, till date the respondents have not considered the same. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that the gradation list has been prepared by the ADGP (Administration)/ respondent No.3. He submits that if the petitioner will submit a fresh representation before the respondent No.3, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and necessary decision will be taken within the stipulated time. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents as well as the pleadings made by the petitioner. 5. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the counsel for the State and looking to the fact that earlier the petitioner has submitted a representation questioning the gradation list prepared 3 / 3 by the respondent No.3, which has not been decided till date, the petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.3 raising all his grievance as raised in this writ petition, within a period of 20 days. In the event of filing of such representation, the respondent No.3 is directed to consider the representation to be submitted by the petitioner and take appropriate decision in accordance with law, within a further period of 30 days from the date of filing of such representation. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar