Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1859 (CHH)

DEVIDAS RAJURKAR v. CHHATTISGARH STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION

WPS/526/2025 · 2025-01-21

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:3560 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 526 of 2025 Devidas Rajurkar S/o Lt. S.R. Rajurkar, Aged About 62 Years, R/o 56/4 Radhika Nagar Supela, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation, Through Secretary, Head Office Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation, Head Office Sector-4, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Karmik Prabandhak, Chhattisgarh Ware Housing Corporation Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Agnihotri, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 21.01.2025 1. Heard Mr. Shikhar Agnihotri, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Anuroop Panda, learned counsel for the respondents. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.01.25 16:29:54 +0530 2 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be allow the petitioner and the Respondent may kindly be directed to provide the Employment provident fund, Employee provident fund, Gratuity and Leave Encashment to the Petitioner with interest of 12% from the date of his retirement. 10.2 That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice along with cost of the petition.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner has served with the respondent-Department and after attaining the age of superannuation, retired from service on 30.11.2024 After his retirement, the retiral dues for which he was entitled was not paid to him. He further submits that he has requested the Department vide letters dated 05.12.2024 and 20.12.2024 to provide his retiral dues, but the Department has not considered and decided the same till date. 4. Learned counsel for respondents would submit that the request of the petitioner will be considered and decided in accordance with law. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed along with writ petition. 3 6. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, without commenting anything on merits of claim of petitioner, at this stage, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the claim of petitioner in accordance with law and to disburse all the retiral dues expeditiously, preferably within a period of 12 weeks from today. 7. Respondents shall also pass the speaking and reasoned order in this regard. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh