BANSH BAHADUR SINGH v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS
/6939/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185897 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185897 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6939 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 -Deputy Director of Consolidation,District Pratapgarh to decide revision No.0568/2025 (computerized No.200853025700016) under Section 48 (1) of Consolidation and Holdings Act titled as "Nimar Singh Vs. Jai Narayan Singh and others", expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation,District Pratapgarh is directed to decide revision No.0568/2025 (computerized No.200853025700016) under Section 48 (1) of Consolidation and Holdings Act titled as "Nimar Singh Vs. Jai Narayan Singh and others" expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 2, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Ghayasuddin Khan, Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Bansh Bahadur Singh .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench