Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18588 (GAU)

DR WALLIUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/969/2025 · 2025-09-03

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010196692025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/969/2025 DR WALLIUL ISLAM S/O- LATE KASIM ALI. R/O- FLAT NO.4A, 4 TH FLOOR, ROMA ENCLAVE, NEAR ARYA HOSPITAL , REHABARI, P.S.- PALTANBAZAR, DIST.- KAMRUP(M). VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAUHATI HIGH COURT, ASSAM 2:AKASH MONDAL S/O- SUNIL MONDAL PERMANENT R/O- KALAPAHAR NEAR VIP HOTEL UNDER FATASHIL AMBARI DIST.- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR Z KAMAR, MR. BISWAJIT TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Bail Appln./2434/2025 DR. WALLIUL ISLAM S/O- LATE KASIM ALI. R/O- FLAT NO.4A Page No.# 2/3 4 TH FLOOR ROMA ENCLAVE NEAR ARYA HOSPITAL REHABARI P.S.- PALTANBAZAR DIST.- KAMRUP(M). VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP ASSAM 2:AKASH MONDAL S/O- SUNIL MONDAL PERMANENT R/O- KALAPAHAR NEAR VIP HOTEL UNDER FATASHIL AMBARI DIST.- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR S J CHOUDHURY Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 04.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. S. J. Choudhury, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M. Das, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. 2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the petitioner, praying for amendment of typographical mistake in mentioning the FIR No. in the Cause Title of the said Bail Application. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the FIR No. has been mentioned that the bail application has Paltanbazar P. S. Case No. Page No.# 3/3 197/2023 however, the correct FIR No. is Paltanbazar P. S. Case No. 193/2023 4. As the said mistake has been committed inadvertently due to the typographical error, he prays for allowing the petitioner to correct the same by filing the amended Cause Title. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor does not oppose the prayer. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel the prayer is allowed. 7. The petitioner shall submit the amended Cause Title in the connected Bail Application No. 2434/2024 within three days from the date of this order and thereafter, take fresh steps for service of notice upon the respondent No.2 by the registered post with A/D as well as by usual mode within a period of seven days from the date of filing of the amended Cause Title, returnable on 22.09.2025. 8. This Interlocutory Application is, accordingly, disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant