AZAD ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
A482/9259/2025 · 2025-11-13
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185876 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185876 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9259 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant for quashing chargesheet no. A03A of 2022 dated 24.04.2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 0228 of 2021 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 506, 120-B IPC, Police Station Ahirauli, District Ambedkar nagar as well as summoning order dated 21.06.2022 passed in Criminal Case No. 143 of 2022 by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar including entire proceedings of aforesaid case.
3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.
5. In view of above, it is provided that applicant is permitted to move his discharge application(s) through counsel within four weeks from today and in case any such application(s) is/are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Azad Ali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
7. In case of failure on the part of applicant in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, he will not be entitled to the benefit of this order.
8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of. November 13, 2025 Raj A482 No. 9259 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench