MAJIDUNNISHA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND OTHERS
/2006/2024 · 2025-11-19
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185870 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185870 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2006 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and the charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage.
2. Learned A.G.A. could not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with the aforesaid liberty. November 19, 2025 R Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Srivastava, Vimal Kishor Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rajendra Prasad Mishra (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Majidunnisha And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench