HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6918 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Heard Shri Hriday Narayan Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned counsel for opposite party no.1, Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the UPRERA to decide the petitioner's complaint dated 03.01.2025 through which the petitioner has challenged the registration of opposite party no.2 on the ground that certain material information has not been submitted by it along with the application for registration. Learned counsel for opposite party no.1 has stated that the provision for filing complaints before the Authority is contained in Section 31 of the U.P. Real Estate (Regulation and Development Rules) , 2016 as per which the complaint shall be filed in the manner prescribed. The provision is contained in Rule 33 of the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate (Regulation & Development Rules), 2016 as per which a complaint has to be made in form 'M'. Petitioner has not filed any complaint as per the provision in the prescribed proforma. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of leaving it open for the petitioner to file a fresh complaint as per the provision which shall be disposed of in accordance with law. November 27, 2025 mks Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hairdaya Narain Tiwari, Ankit Kumar Pandey, Atul Tiwari, Hari Mangal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shobhit Mohan Shukla (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Matrulal .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Thru. Chairman Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench