Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185861 (ALL)

SHIV NATH SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. AMRIT ABHIJAT THE ADDL. CHIEF SECY. URBAN DEVE. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

CAPL/1222/2025 · 2025-12-01

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1222 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. The opposite party has filed further compliance affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that two things which are noticeable are that firstly, in compliance affidavit filed by the opposite parties, it is nowhere mentioned that the pension will be paid regularly to the applicants every month and secondly, there is a dispute pertaining to the determination of the dearness allowance paid to the applicant. 3. In reply thereto, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has submitted that the pension will be paid regularly every month as in this regard, an affidavit has already been given before the Division Bench and there is no occasion to flout the same. As far as the dispute relating to determination of dearness allowance is concerned, the writ court has directed for payment of dearness allowance which is due to the applicants and as per the opposite party no. 4, whatever is permissible in accordance with law for payment of dearness allowance, that has already been paid and if there is any dispute about the amount, the applicants may avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law. 4. In view of the facts, circumstances and discussion made hereinabove, as the judgment and order passed in the writ petition stands complied with, the present contempt application has Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Savita Jain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rishabh Kapoor Shiv Nath Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) Amrit Abhijat The Addl. Chief Secy. Urban Deve. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) become infructuous and is dismissed as such, with liberty to the applicants to avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law, if they are still aggrieved. 5. Notice, if any, stands discharged. December 1, 2025 DiVYa CAPL No. 1222 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench