Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010197052025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5136/2025 BHUBAN DAS S/O- LATE BALIRAM DAS, R/O- WARD NO. 3 (MORIPACHATIA), MORIGAON TOWN, P.S., P.O. AND DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782105. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 11 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNEMNT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY- 781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781005. 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105. 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MORIGAON DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105. 5:THE OFFICER-IN-CHAREG MORIGAON POLICE STATION MORIGAON Page No.# 2/4 DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105. 6:MAYNUL HOQUE S/O- LATE ABDUL RASHID R/O- VILL.- CHARAIHAGI P.O. DOMAL P.S. DHARAMTUL DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782412. 7:JAKIR HUSSAIN S/O- ABDUL HAI R/O- VILL.- HAKENAMARA CHARAIHAGI P.O. PS. AND DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105. 8:ROBI HUSSAIN S/O- ABDUL HAI R/O- VILL.- HAKENAMARA CHARAIHAGI P.O. PS. AND DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105. 9:DIPEN BHUYAN S/O- LATE LOKNATH BHUYAN R/O- WARD NO. 2 MORIGAON TOWN P.O. PS AND DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105. 10:PREMANANDA BHUYAN S/O- LATE LOKNATH BHUYAN R/O- NAVHETI WARD NO. 9 MORIGAON TOWN P.O. P.S. AND DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM Page No.# 3/4 PIN- 782105. 11:RUPAM BHUYAN S/O- PREMANANDA BHUYAN R/O- NAVHETI WARD NO. 9 MORIGAON TOWN P.O. P.S. AND DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105. 12:LALIT CHANDRA DAS S/O- NANDA DAS R/O- VILL.- MATI PARBAT P.O. AND P.S. DHARAMTUL DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782412 Advocate for the Petitioner : ALHAJJ I UDDIN, MRS. R MOMTAZ,MR ROBIUL HOQUE,H M I HOQUE,MR S J SHAMIM Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 03.09.2025 Heard Shri AI Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri N Das, learned State Counsel, Assam. The grievance of the petitioner is against the running of a brick kiln by the private respondents as well as inaction of the police authorities in the complaint lodged alleging forceful eviction as well as land grabbing. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh by making necessary party respondents. Page No.# 4/4 The writ petition is accordingly closed with liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant