Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185811 (ALL)

GAUTAM SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR/DIST. MAGISTRATE DIST. SHRAVASTI U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/11108/2025 · 2025-12-01

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11108 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the H.D.F.C. Bank submits that if a payment of rupees nine and a half lakhs is made within a period of three months, they will regularize the account of the petitioner. 3. In light of the submission made, the petitioner is directed to make payment of the above amount within a period of three months from date. 4. We make it clear that no further extension shall be granted and the order is peremptory in nature. 5. In light of the order passed above, the recovery certificate is kept in abeyance for a period of three months and if the payment is made by the petitioner, as directed above, the recovery citation shall be kept in abeyance sine die. 6. With the aforesaid observation / direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 1, 2025 Lokesh Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ayra, Kavita Shukla, Ravi Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manu Dixit (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Gautam Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector/Dist. Magistrate Dist. Shravasti U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench