[2025:RJ-JP:29324] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1617/2003 1. Harbhajan Singh, s/o Late Sardar Mangal Singh, c/o, M/s Chadha Textile Traders, Katla Purohitji, Jaipur 2. M/s Chadha Textile Traders, through its Proprietor Harbhajan Singh, s/o Late Sardar Mangal Singh, Katla Purohitji, Jaipur. -----Defendants/Appellants No.1 & 4 Versus 1. Raj Kumar Sharma, s/o Shri Ram Niwas Sharma, r/o House No.78, Bhatton-ka-Rasta, Sireh Deoli Bazar, Chowkri Ram Chandraji, Jaipur. ----Plaintiff/Respondent 2. Gulbir Singh s/o Late Sardar Mangal Singh, c/o Chadha Textile Traders, Katla Purohitji, Jaipur 3. Sardar Govind Singh, s/o Late Sardar Mangal Singh, c/o Chadha Textile Traders, Katla Purohitji, Jaipur ----Defendants/Respondents No.2 & 3 For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 31/07/2025 The present appeal has been filed by the defendant/appellants under Section 22 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950, against the impugned order dated 04.07.2003 passed by learned Additional District Judge No.6, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Civil Suit No.41/2002 titled as ‘Raj Kumar Sharma Vs. Harbhajan Singh’, whereby the learned Trial Court has provisionally fixed the standard rent at the rate of Rs.2,000/-. From the status report of the learned Court below, it transpired that the Civil Suit No.41/2002 titled as ‘Raj Kumar [2025:RJ-JP:29324] (2 of 2) [CMA-1617/2003] Sharma Vs. Harbhajan Singh’, was decreed by the learned Trial Court against the defendant/appellants No.1 and 4 on 09.05.2007. Therefore, this appeal has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/58