1 2025:CGHC:18104 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2694 of 2025 1 Smt. Reena Bharadwaj W/o Shri Rooplal Dansena Aged About 37 Years Working As Patwali, Presently Posted At P.H.No.- 19, Alola, Tehsil Kapu, District- Raigarh (C.G.) R/o Sukbasupara, Kapu, District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 Collector Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 3 Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Dharamjaigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4 Committee (Transfer Committee) Revenue Department, Dharamjaigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Sumit Singh Rathore, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Shri Vinay Pandey, Dy. A.G. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.04.23 10:27:50 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 22/04/2025 Heard. 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner, is questioning her transfer by order dated 09.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) from present place of posting i.e. P.H. No. 19 Alola, Tahsil Kapu, district Raigarh to P.H. No.32 Darridih, Tehsil Dharamjaigarh district Raigarh. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits, that the petitioner’s husband is also a government servant posted at distance of 15 kms as a Assistant Teacher and the petitioner is having a two year old child with her. He further submits that due to transfer to new place of posting, the petitioner will suffer irreparably. He further submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation before the SDO but the same has not been decided till date. 3. Learned State counsel submits that impugned order dated 09.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) is not a transfer order, infact it is a work distribution order by the SDO and if the petitioner is having some grievance regarding her posting at P.H. No.32 Darridih, Tehsil Dharamjaigarh, the petitioner may approach the 3 Collector through a fresh representation and the same will the considered and decided in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the paties and perused the pleadings and representaiton filed by the petitioner. 5. As per the pleadings of the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner is having two year old child and her husband is also a government servant posted in the primary School Salkheta which is at distance of 15 kms from the present place of posting. 6. Considering the same, at this juncture, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the petitioner to approach the Collector, Raigarh by filing a representation explaining her grievance about the posting and the same be considered and decided within a period of 25 days from today. Till then, status quo as exist today shall be maintained. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. 8. The petitioner is at liberty to apprise the Collector, Raigarh about the order of this court. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti