Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185764 (ALL)

Ghisiyawan and Others v. STATE OF U.P. THRU ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPT. LKO AND ORS.

/11256/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11256 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. 2. The captioned writ petition has been filed by the petitioner inter alia, praying therein for the following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite Party No. 4 & 5 to take prompt action upon the local revenue authority and local police i.e. opposite parties no. 6 to 10, who are trying to evict the petitioners from their leased/cultivatory land, a part of Gata No. 508 Min. Area 14 Biswa each, situated at Village- Manikpur, Tehsil- Bhiti, District Ambedkar Nagar, without adopting any procedure under law and without any order of the competent court. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite Party No. 3 & 4 to take prompt action on the representation/application dated 10.10.2025 preferred by the petitioners, by conducting an exhaustive enquiry regarding manipulation in revenue records during consolidation operation under the shelter of large number of Minjumla Gatas i.e. old Gata No. 101 Min., recorded as Banzar & Jungle-Dhak, now new Gata No. 508 Minzumla situated at Village- Manikpur, Tehsil-Bhiti, District-Ambedkar Nagar and take a decision forthwith as contained in Annexure No.-1 to this writ petition." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rama Niwas Pathak, Raghaw Ram Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ghisiyawan And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Dept. Lko And Ors. .....Respondent(s) 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents, on the basis of instructions received through a letter dated November 27, 2025 sent by the Tehsildar, Bhiti, District Ambedkar Nagar, submits that as on date, they are not evicting the petitioner from the land in question. It has further been submitted that if in the future any proceedings for eviction are initiated, they shall be initiated in accordance with law. 4. The said instructions are kept on record. 5. In view of the aforesaid categorical stand taken by the State- respondents, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. November 28, 2025 cks/- WRIC No. 11256 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench