Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185763 (ALL)

SHANI ALIAS ANSH PRATAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/5660/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5660 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application, hence the same may be rejected as not pressed with liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement, application is rejected as not pressed with liberty aforesaid. 4. Office is directed to return the original/certified copies to the counsel for the applicant after retaining the photocopies of the same on record. November 28, 2025 Rao/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jalaj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Shani Alias Ansh Pratap .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench