C.G. INSTITUTE OF NURSING v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/1969/2025 · 2025-04-17
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18575 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18575 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:17710
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1969 of 2025 1 - C.G. Institute of Nursing Through Its Principal- Namrata Nikhil Issac, W/o- Nikhil Raj Issac, Aged About- 42 Years, Situated At- Nature City Campus, Sakri, Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Health Services, Directorate Of Health Services, North Block, Sector-19, Swasthya Bhawan, 2nd Floor, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh, Pin- 492002 3 - Chhattisgarh Nursing Council Through Its Registrar, Old Nurses Hostel, Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Registrar Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Memorial Health Science And Ayush University Of Chhattisgarh, Situated At- Sector- 40, Uparwara, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 493661 5 - Nainshi Sahu D/o Late Shiv Charan Sahu Aged About 20 Years R/o- 422, Bedsara, Tehsil And District- Janjgir- Champa, (C.G.)
... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Rajat Agrawal, Advocate For Respective Respondents : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Deputy Government Advocate, Shri Vikas Dubey and Shri Ajay Kumar Dwivedi, Advocates Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.04.17 20:50:40 +0530
2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 17/04/2025
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to bona fide mistake name of respondent No.5 could not be sent to the Director of Medical Education for verification. The name of respondent No.5 has already been sent to the university, however, as it was not required earlier, it could not be sent to the Director of Medical Education. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have filed a representation which is required to be decided otherwise future of respondent No.5 will be on stake.
2. Considering the fact that the verification letter in respect of respondent No.5 has already been sent to the university, the Director of Medical Education is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders so that the future of respondent No.5 may not be on stake. The petitioner is directed to approach before the concerned authorities on 21.4.2025 along with the relevant documents in respect of respondent No.5 and in turn the Director of Medical Education is required to consider the same and pass appropriate orders on or before 26.4.2025 which is the last date for online registration.
3. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is
disposed of. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Gopal Singh