MEVA LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/14716/2025 · 2025-12-18
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185744 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185744 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14716 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pankaj Patel, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Netram, learned counsel for the District Basic Education Officer and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :-
"(i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing and commanding the opposite parties, to forthwith regularise the services of the petitioner on Class IV Post of Sweeper cum Chaukidar, in terms of the judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jaggo v Union of India and others, AIR 2025 SC 296, as well as Dharam Singh and others v State of U.P. and others, MANU/SC/1111/2025." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/District Basic Education Officer, Lakhimpur Kheri and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court.
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tushar Bhushan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Net Ram Meva Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/ District Basic Education Officer, Lakhimpur Kheri within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby
disposed of. December 18, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14716 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench