MAULANA AKMAL v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10619/2025 · 2025-11-04
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185740 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185740 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10619 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant despite notice. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.273 of 2025, under Section 64(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3/4(2) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station - Sakran, District - Sitapur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in terms of the FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant gone to Madarsa for study where the applicant who was teaching as Maulana. On the false pretext of marriage, the applicant formed physical relations with her and now their relations had become sour, he went to Maulana to direct him to marry her daughter which he refused. In statement under Section 180 BNSS, the victim reiterated the version that on false pretext of marriage, the relations were formed between them and now the applicant was refusing to marry her. There is no definite document with regard to age of the victim. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering statement of the victim that relationship continued for a large span of one year coupled with the fact that the applicant, aged about 20 years, is in custody since 11.09.2025 and has no criminal antecedent, I Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Narendra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Maulana Akmal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant- Maulana Akmal be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 4, 2025 Mohit Singh/- BAIL No. 10619 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench