HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6409 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.4-Gaon Sabha has been accepted by Sri Mohan Singh. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil- Jaisinghpur, Sultanpur to decide case No.1943/2020, computerized case No.T- 202004680701943 "Smt. Firoza Bano Vs. Smt. Mafidul Nisha and others) preferred by opposite party No.3 under Section 116 of U.P.Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil- Jaisinghpur, Sultanpur is desired to make all endeavor to decide case No.1943/2020, computerized case No.T-202004680701943 "Smt. Firoza Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Mishra, Anand Kumar Dubey, Ashish Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Smt. Mafidul Nisha .....Petitioner(s) Divisional Magistrate, Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s) Bano Vs. Smt. Mafidul Nisha and others) preferred by opposite party No.3 under Section 116 of U.P.Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 3, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6409 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench