SANTOSH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
/11503/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11503 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No.4 and 5, on the basis of instructions received from the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Pratapgarh, submits that the classes are not being carried out in the dilapidated building and are, in fact, being conducted in two rooms which are not dilapidated. He further submits that the tender has been invited for demolition of the said dilapidated building and the date of auction is fixed for December 5, 2025.
3. The said instructions are kept on record.
4. In light of the above instructions received, we dispose of this writ petition with directions that no classes should be carried out in the dilapidated building and the respondents should ensure that the dilapidated building is demolished at the earliest in accordance with law. December 2, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Santosh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench