SUDHIR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.SECONDARY EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKO.and ORS.
WRIA/5636/2017 · 2025-11-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185725 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185725 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5636 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 19, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sudhir Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Secondary Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench