ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU DIRECTOR SECONDARY LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
WRIA/4910/2018 · 2025-11-04
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185716 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185716 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4910 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 4, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sarjoo Ram, Prachi, Praveen Kumar Tripathi, Shrikant Mishra, Vinod Kumar Kulshresth Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dev Mani Mishra, Sharad Pathak (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Anil Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Director Secondary Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench