Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18571 (RAJ)

SONIYA LONGANI D/O SHRI HARISH KUMAR W/O SHRI GULSHAN AHUJO v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2923/2020 · 2025-08-05

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29909] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2923/2020 1. Soniya Longani D/o Shri Harish Kumar W/o Shri Gulshan Ahujo, Aged About 19 Years 3 Months, R/o Keru House, Makranamohalla, Ward No. 35, Jodhpur, At Present R/o Gehlot Colony, Ramjan Nagar, Beawar, Dist. Ajmer, Raj. 2. Gulshan Ahujo S/o Shri Laxmandas Ahujo, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Sendara, Pali, At Present R/o Gehlot Colony, Ramjan Nagar, Beawar, Dist. Ajmer, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home Govt. Of Raj., Secretariat, Raj. Jaipur. 2. Superintendent of Police, Ajmer. 3. S.H.O., Police Station Beawar City, District. Ajmer. 4. Shri Harish Longani S/o Shri Khushal Das Longani, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Nagori Gate, Near Home Heritage, Jodhpur, Raj. 5. Smt. Nisha Logani W/o Shri Harish Longani, R/o Nagori Gate, Near Home Heritage, Jodhpur, Raj. 6. Meena Uttamchandani W/o Shrimadan Mohan Uttamchandani, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Gulab Nagar, Jodhpur. 7. Laxman Das Ahuja S/o Shri Sheva Ram, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Sadar Bazar, Sendara, Dist. Pali, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ishan Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Add.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 05/08/2025 1. The miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners for getting protection from private respondents No. 4 to 7 in the year 2020. [2025:RJ-JP:29909] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2923/2020] 2. The present petition is pending for almost last 5 years. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have solemnized their marriage and they are living their married life peacefully. 4. Copy of the marriage registration certificate dated 14.07.2020 has been annexed as Annexure-4. 5. Till today, no one has reported before this Court that any harm has been caused to the petitioners, therefore, no further directions are required to be issued by this Court. 6. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /17