RAM AUTAR v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, U.P. LUCKNOW
BAIL/89/2024 · 2025-11-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185697 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185697 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 89 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. The Counsel for the applicant states that the trial has been concluded.
2. In view thereof, the application is rendered infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. November 3, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Tiwari, Shweta Devi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ram Sajan Yadav, Rama Kant Dixit, Sameer Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ram Autar .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, U.P. Lucknow .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench