Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185689 (ALL)

JYOTI CHANDRA NATH AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/9701/2025 · 2025-11-19

Brij Raj Singh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9701 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party no.1 and Sri Ankit Kumar Singh, learned counsel who has filed power on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 3. By means of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 B.N.S.S., the applicants have sought quashing of summoning order dated 04.09.2024 as well as Non-Bailable Warrant dated 02.07.2025 passed in Complaint Case No. 1690 of 2024 (Aditi Raj Vs. Jyoti Chandra Nath and Others), Police Station - Jankipuram, District - Lucknow pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, IV, Court No.30, Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants would like to file an application for discharge under the provisions of Cr.P.C., to which learned counsels for the opposite parties, do not have any objection. 5. Accordingly, the applicants are granted liberty to file an application for discharge in conformity with the provisions of Cr.P.C., within a period of two weeks from today. After the said application is filed, learned trial court is directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter. The applicants are also granted liberty to appear through their Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rohitash Kumar Singh, Kapil Dev Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jyoti Chandra Nath And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) counsel. Till expiry of six weeks or disposal of application for discharge, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against them. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. November 19, 2025 Mohit Singh/- A482 No. 9701 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench