HIMANCHAL CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO.
/6869/2025 · 2025-11-19
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185684 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185684 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6869 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate-I for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.577 of 2025, under Sections 309(6), 352, 351(3), 61(2), 317(2) B.N.S., registered at Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District - Barabanki. 3. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. It has also been submitted on behalf of the applicant that the co- accused Sumit Verma has already been granted bail by this Court by means of order dated 14.11.2025, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.7233 of 2025. Photocopy of the bail order is taken on record. 4. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation but he does not dispute this fact that the co-accused, having identical role has already been granted bail by this Court. 5. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 10.06.2025 and co-accused person has been granted bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 6. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Himanchal Chauhan be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Kaushal Kumar, Satyam Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Himanchal Chauhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko.
.....Opposite Party(s)
of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. November 19, 2025 DiVYa BAIL No. 6869 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench