Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185682 (ALL)

HARSHITA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/10110/2025 · 2025-11-06

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10110 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. On an objection raised by learned A.G.A. that an F.I.R. has been lodged in this matter, which has not been challenged, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh with proper pleadings and prayers. To which, there is no objection by learned A.G.A. 3. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. November 6, 2025 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Harshita And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench