SAGAR DHANUK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.ADMINISTRATION LUCKNOW and ANR.
WRIA/5270/2017 · 2025-11-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185680 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185680 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5270 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Mr. Nirankar Singh, counsel for respondent no. 2 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 19, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Maheep Kumar Singh, Anil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Nirankar Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sagar Dhanuk .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Administration Lucknow And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench