CHANDAN PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. U.P. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/12938/2025 · 2025-11-07
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185674 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185674 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12938 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard petitioner in person and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned for grant of subsistence allowance in terms of Rule 53 of Financial Hand Book Volume 2, Parts 2-4.
3. Considering the nature of prayer being made, opposite party no.2 i.e. Engineer in Chief, U.P. Public Works Department, Lucknow is directed to ensure payment of subsistence allowance to petitioner for the period he was under suspension. Actual payment thereof shall be ensured by authority concerned within a period of three weeks from receipt of a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 7, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Chandan Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. U.P. Public Works Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench