RAM PAL PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIA/12921/2025 · 2025-11-10
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185668 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185668 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12921 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard Mr. Sharad Pathak, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Pawan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J.N. Mathur, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State. Present petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-
"(I) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 21.10.2025 passed by opposite party no. 2, copy of which is contained as Annexure No. I to the writ petition and all consequential order passed in furtherance of such impugned order dated 21.10.2025, after summoning original of the same from the opposite parties; (II) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the commanding the opposite parties to allow all service benefits to the petitioner including salary, arrears of salary if any, and other dues, notwithstanding to the impugned order dated 21.10.2025 passed by opposite party no. 2, copy of which is contained as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition." While placing application for dismissal of the writ petition, it has been pointed out by Mr. J.N. Mathur that the State Government, vide the order dated 16.9.2025, has directed the committee concerned to take further decision on the issue of regularization of the services of the petitioner and, in compliance thereof, the Regional Committee has taken decision, which is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Kumar Pandey, Sharad Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Pal Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
under challenged in this writ petition. He submitted that the order passed by the State Government dated 16.9.2025, has not been challenged by the petitioner. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh, while challenging the order passed by the State Government. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, as not pressed, with liberty, as sought above.
November 10, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 12921 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench