Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185645 (ALL)

MATTA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9806/2025 · 2025-10-30

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9806 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Ms. Sejal Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Meera Tripathi, learned AGA for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 3. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. This petition has been filed seeking following mail relief:- "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no.2 to conduct an inquiry against the Opposite party no.4 by which the opposite party no.4 misconducted and did not perform his duty Properly and harassed the petitioner and did not comply with the mandatory provision of B.N.S.S. during the investigation on complaint dated 18.03.2025 of the petitioner." 4. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has produced before this Court a copy of the instruction/letter dated 15.10.2025. The same is taken on record. As per the aforesaid instruction, the investigation has been concluded by the Circle Officer, Nighasan and the charge sheet no. 476 of 2025 has been filed. So far as the allegations against the opposite party no. 4 are concerned, those allegations are not correct. 5. Be that as it may, if the charge-sheet has been filed by the Circle Officer, who is Investigation Officer in the present case, so nothing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Matta Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition but it is always open to the petitioner or any aggrieved person to take appropriate legal recourse before the appropriate authority/court of law. 6. This petition is, accordingly, disposed of finally in view of the aforesaid terms. October 30 , 2025 Anuj Singh CRLP No. 9806 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench