RAMBALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SEC. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/7110/2025 · 2025-11-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185643 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185643 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7110 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.89 of 2025, under Sections 65(1), 352, 351(3) of BNS and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the applicant had captured a photograph of the daughter of the informant and formed physical relations under the threat of making the photos viral. In the statement 180 of BNSS, the victim stated that nothing wrong was done to her, however, in the statement under Section 183 of BNS, the wrong was done to her. The tentative age of the victim is around 16 years. The medical on record does not corroborate the allegation. There is no definite document with regard to the exact age of the victim. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the FIR version that the relationship continued over a span of one year and there being no recovery of any video and the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 26.03.2025, I am of the view that the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Trivendra Pratap Singh, Sudhaker Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ashok Kumar, Vijay Shankar Singh Rambali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Sec. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Ram Bali be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 11, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 7110 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench