ANUJ SINGH @ ANUJ KUMAR SINGH v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./8517/2025 · 2025-05-15
Chandra Shekhar Jha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18563 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18563 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8517 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-2018 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Anuj Singh @ Anuj Kumar Singh, S/o Late Ramotar Singh, R/o Village- Dakhingaon, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Rahul Kumar S/o Anuj Singh
3. Roshan Kumar S/o Sunil Singh
4. Rajiv Kumar S/o Antu Singh
5. Shlok Kumar @ Shlok Kumar Singh S/o Yogendra Singh
6. Anuj Singh S/o Ram Baran Singh
7. Pervez Khan S/o Yunus Khan All are R/o village-Bhalrahi, P.S.- Wazirganj, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 3 15-05-2025 After short argument, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made statement at Bar that petitioner would not made any such attempts in future, which prima facie appears to delay the trial and, therefore, he be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P. No.2 during course of hearing referred the oral order dated 18.07.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.82207 of 2023 and also the oral order dated 26.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8517 of 2025(3) dt.15-05-2025 2/2 No.15014 of 2025.
3. It is submitted that while dealing with Cr. Misc. No.82207 of 2023, the learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court categorically observed that the informant is in habit of making false statement before this Court.
4. Let be so, in view of statement as made at Bar, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Petitioner is directed to remain careful in future.
6. It is submitted by learned counsel for O.P. No.2 that case before learned trial court is at stage of argument.
7. In view of same, learned trial court is directed to dispose of this case within 2 (two) months of receiving of this
order.
Sanjeet/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) U T