Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18563 (BOM)

DADASAHEB BHAIDAS SHRIPAT SALUNKHE RAJYA SHASKIYA.... THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SHALIKRAM DAULAT KANHAIY v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

CA/5686/2025 · 2025-09-19

Shri Manish Pitale, Shri Y G Khobragade

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1093ca5686-25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5686 OF 2025 IN WP/1225/2017 Dadasaheb Bhaidas Shripat Salunkhe Rajya Shaskiya Trutiya Shreni Karmachari Sahakari Gruha Nirman Sanstha Maryadit Through Its Chairman Shalikram Daulat Kanhaiy VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another … Mr. Harshal Prakash Randhir, Advocate for Applicant Ms. Neha B. Kamble, AGP for the Respondents-State ..... CORAM : MANISH PITALE & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 19th September, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. By this application, the applicant/petitioner seeks permission to place on record certain events that had taken place during pendency of this petition. In that context, the applicant seeks to place on record certain documents and also seeks to add further respondents. Grounds of challenge are also sought to be added alongwith additional prayers in the petition. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner as well as learned AGP for the respondents. We find that the proposed amendment can be granted as, the proposed amendment would assist the court in disposing of the writ petition in a comprehensive manner. 3. In that light, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause B. 2025:BHC-AUG:25419-DB 1093ca5686-25 4. Amendment shall be carried out within two weeks from today. Amended papers shall be served upon the respondents within one week thereof. 5. The respondents are granted liberty to file additional affidavit in reply in the light of amendment of the writ petition. ( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( MANISH PITALE, J. ) JPChavan