Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18563 (ALL)

SURAJ v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/1916/2025 · 2025-07-02

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103315 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1916 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suraj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kirtika Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Navin Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Kritika Singh, learned counsel for respondent- Nagar Palika Parishad. 2. It is not under dispute that entire retiral dues are still not paid to petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for respondent submits that respondent- Nagar Palika Parishad, Khurja is facing financial constraints, however, still they are under legal obligation to clear all arrears as on date. 4. It is informed that arrears are about Rs.14 lac and out of which the petitioner was paid about Rs.5 lac on different dates within last 6 to 8 months. Learned counsel further submits that remaining amount likely to be paid in 3 equal installments within few months. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is in need of money, therefore, respondent- Nagar Palika Parishad, Khurja be directed to pay remaining retiral dues within a short period. 6. It is not under dispute that respondent- Nagar Palika Parishad, Khurja is under financial constraints and out of about Rs.14 lac about Rs.5 lac was paid recently as well as proposal to pay remaining amount of about Rs.10 lac by way of three installments is also proposed, therefore this writ petition is disposed of with an observation/direction that concerned respondent will pay all remaining retiral dues within short period in three installments. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad