Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185621 (ALL)

ANAND KUMAR ASTHANA v. SHRI. P. GURU PRASAD, PRIN. SECY. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING DEPTT. OF GOVT. OF U.P., LKO.

CAPL/4692/2024 · 2025-10-31

Manish Kumar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4692 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned counsel for State. 2. Learned counsel for applicant has fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Notice, if any, stand discharged. October 31, 2025 Arti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shishir Jain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Anand Kumar Asthana .....Applicant(s) Shri. P. Guru Prasad, Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Deptt. Of Govt. Of U.P., Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench