S. No. 20 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 95/2025 Om Parkash …..Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate. Vs. UT of J&K and ors. ….. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 10.02.2025 After arguing for a while, learned counsel seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy before the competent Court, i.e., the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samba, before which Court, the challan has been filed vide order dated 05.02.2025. In the aforesaid backdrop, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, it is made clear that dismissal of the instant writ petition would not come in the way of the petitioner to challenge the order of suspension, which has been passed by the respondents. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge JAMMU 10.02.2025 Shafqat Ram Krishan 2025.02.10 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document