2025:JHHC:19230 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3736 of 2025 ----- Vivekanand, S/o Sagar Ray, R/o 1157 Gali No.12, Mahipalpur, South West Delhi, P.O. Mahipalpur, P.S. Mahipalpur, Area- South West Delhi/ NCT- Delhi .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.M. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Naveen Kr. Jaiswal, Advocate For the State : Ms. Lily Sahay, AddI. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee, Advocate Mr. Avik Ghosh, Advocate …...... 04/ 15.07.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application filed by the petitioner praying for grant of anticipatory bail under Sections 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, apprehending his arrest for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, in connection with Sonua P.S. Case No.7 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chakradharpur. 3. An altercation had taken place between the neighbours and the petitioner alleged to have participated in the said altercation and given a stick blow on the shoulder of husband of the informant. Only one blow was given. 4. After going through the F.I.R. and the facts available on record, I find that so far as Section 109 of BNS is concerned, the same cannot be attracted to this petitioner. So far as Section 74 of BNS is concerned, there is vague allegation, thus, it is doubtful whether the same at this stage can also be attracted or not against this petitioner. All the other offences are bailable in nature. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, petitioner should appear before the concerned Court, who will pass an appropriate order after considering the aforesaid observations. 6. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. R.S./ (ANANDA SEN, J.)